On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:14:40AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>   Hi,
> 
> > > +static struct resource *request_capability(struct pci_dev *dev, int off,
> > > +                                    const char *name)
> > > +{
> > > + u8 bar;
> > > + u32 offset, length;
> > > +
> > > + pci_read_config_byte(dev, off + offsetof(struct virtio_pci_cap,
> > > +                                          bar),
> > > +                      &bar);
> > > + pci_read_config_dword(dev, off + offsetof(struct virtio_pci_cap, 
> > > offset),
> > > +                      &offset);
> > > + pci_read_config_dword(dev, off + offsetof(struct virtio_pci_cap, 
> > > length),
> > > +                       &length);
> > > +
> > > + return request_mem_region(pci_resource_start(dev, bar) + offset,
> > > +                           length, name);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > 
> > For device config, this might request too much. The spec says:
> >     The drivers SHOULD only map part of configuration structure large enough
> >     for device operation.
> 
> We don't map it here though.  We just reserve what belongs to virtio
> according to the capabilities.
> 
> > I think you should limit this to PAGE_SIZE like we do for map_capability.
> 
> notify is much larger than PAGE_SIZE.

Yes - I mean for the device config.

> > >   err = -EINVAL;
> > >   vp_dev->common = map_capability(pci_dev, common,
> > >                                   sizeof(struct virtio_pci_common_cfg), 4,
> > 
> > map_capability has a bunch of checks in place to validate the capability
> > structure. With request_capability called earlier, they are now done too
> > late.
> 
> Hmm, lets move the checks to find_capability then?
> 
> cheers,
>   Gerd
> 
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to