On 10/23/2015 12:16 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:46:33AM -0700, Rick Jones wrote: >> On 10/22/2015 02:33 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 01:27:29AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer for a while at the >>>> end of tx processing. The maximum time spent on polling were limited >>>> through a module parameter. To avoid block rx, the loop will end it >>>> there's new other works queued on vhost so in fact socket receive >>>> queue is also be polled. >>>> >>>> busyloop_timeout = 50 gives us following improvement on TCP_RR test: >>>> >>>> size/session/+thu%/+normalize% >>>> 1/ 1/ +5%/ -20% >>>> 1/ 50/ +17%/ +3% >>> Is there a measureable increase in cpu utilization >>> with busyloop_timeout = 0? >> And since a netperf TCP_RR test is involved, be careful about what netperf >> reports for CPU util if that increase isn't in the context of the guest OS.
Right, the cpu utilization is measured on host. >> >> For completeness, looking at the effect on TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERTS, >> aggregate _RR and even aggregate _RR/packets per second for many VMs on the >> same system would be in order. >> >> happy benchmarking, >> >> rick jones > Absolutely, merging a new kernel API just for a specific > benchmark doesn't make sense. > I'm guessing this is just an early RFC, a fuller submission > will probably include more numbers. > Yes, will run more complete tests. Thanks _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
