On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 04:16:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > I parked this in vhost tree for now, though the inclusion of patch 1 from tip > creates a merge conflict - but one that is trivial to resolve. > > So I intend to just merge it all through my tree, including the > duplicate patch, and assume conflict will be resolved. > > I would really appreciate some feedback on arch bits (especially the x86 > bits), > and acks for merging this through the vhost tree.
Thanks for doing this, looks good to me. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
