> On Oct 20, 2017, at 5:20 PM, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > * Thomas Garnier <thgar...@google.com> wrote: > >>>> */ >>>> - cmpq $.Lentry_SYSCALL_64_after_fastpath_call, (%rsp) >>>> + leaq .Lentry_SYSCALL_64_after_fastpath_call(%rip), %r11 >>>> + cmpq %r11, (%rsp) >>>> jne 1f > >>> This patch seems to add extra overhead to the syscall fast-path even when >>> PIE is >>> disabled, right? >> >> It does add extra instructions when one is not possible, I preferred >> that over ifdefing but I can change it. > > So my problem is, this pattern repeats in many other places as well, but > sprinking > various pieces of assembly code with #ifdefs would be very bad as well. > > I have no good idea how to solve this. > > Thanks,
Ugh, brain was off. This is a bit messy. We could use a macro for this, too, I suppose. > > Ingo _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
