On 02/11/17 14:25, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 11/01/2017 06:01 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 11/01/2017 04:58 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
>>> +/* TODO: To be removed in a future kernel version */
>>> static __init int xen_parse_nopvspin(char *arg)
>>> {
>>> - xen_pvspin = false;
>>> + pr_warn("xen_nopvspin is deprecated, replace it with
>>> \"pvlock_type=queued\"!\n");
>>> + if (!pv_spinlock_type)
>>> + pv_spinlock_type = locktype_queued;
>> Since we currently end up using unfair locks and because you are
>> deprecating xen_nopvspin I wonder whether it would be better to set this
>> to locktype_unfair so that current behavior doesn't change. (Sorry, I
>> haven't responded to your earlier message before you posted this). Juergen?
>
> I think the latest patch from Juergen in tip is to use native qspinlock
> when xen_nopvspin is specified. Right? That is why I made the current
> choice. I can certainly change to unfair if it is what you guys want.
No, when we are keeping xen_nopvspin (even as deprecated) it should
behave as designed, so locktype_queued is correct.
Juergen
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
