2017-12-02 0:55 GMT+08:00 weiping zhang <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:50:44AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:23:01 +0800 >> weiping zhang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > index can be reused by other virtio device. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <[email protected]> >> >> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <[email protected]> >> >> > --- >> > drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 2 ++ >> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c >> > index 48230a5..bf7ff39 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c >> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c >> > @@ -333,6 +333,8 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev) >> > /* device_register() causes the bus infrastructure to look for a >> > * matching driver. */ >> > err = device_register(&dev->dev); >> > + if (err) >> > + ida_simple_remove(&virtio_index_ida, dev->index); >> > out: >> > if (err) >> > virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED); >> >> I think your patch is correct (giving up the index if we failed to >> register), but this made me look at our error handling if a virtio >> device failed to register. >> >> We hold an extra reference to the struct device, even after a failed >> register, and it is the responsibility of the caller to give up that >> reference once no longer needed. As callers toregister_virtio_device() >> embed the struct virtio_device, it needs to be their responsibility. >> Looking at the existing callers, >> >> - ccw does a put_device >> - pci, mmio and remoteproc do nothing, causing a leak >> - vop does a free on the embedding structure, which is a big no-no >> >> Thoughts? > Sorry to relay late and thanks for your review. > Do you mean the "extra reference to the struct device" caused by the > following code? > > err = device_register(&dev->dev); > device_add(dev) > get_device(dev) > If I'm understand right, I think there is no extra reference if we fail > virtio_register_device, because if device_register we don't get a > reference.
I go through these callers, virtio_mmio_probe should do more cleanup. I'll sent a patch fix that. > -- > Thanks > weiping _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
