On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:28:38PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:57:52PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 09:51:48PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > WRITE_ONCE(obj->val, 1); > > > > > smp_wmb(); > > > > > WRITE_ONCE(*foo, obj); > > > > > > > > I believe Peter was instead suggesting: > > > > > > > > WRITE_ONCE(obj->val, 1); > > > > smp_store_release(foo, obj); > > > > > > Isn't that more expensive though? > > > > Depends on the architecture. The only architecture where it is more > > expensive and people actually still care about is ARM I think. > > Right. Why should I use the more expensive smp_store_release then?
Because it makes more sense. Memory ordering is hard enough, don't make it harder still if you don't have to. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
