Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 01:28:51AM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote: >On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:26:08PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:59:50 -0700 >> Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudr...@intel.com> wrote: >> >> > Use the registration/notification framework supported by the generic >> > bypass infrastructure. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudr...@intel.com> >> > --- >> >> Thanks for doing this. Your current version has couple show stopper >> issues. >> >> First, the slave device is instantly taking over the slave. >> This doesn't allow udev/systemd to do its device rename of the slave >> device. Netvsc uses a delayed work to workaround this. > >Interesting. Does this mean udev must act within a specific time window >then?
Yeah. That is scarry. Also, wrong. > >> Secondly, the select queue needs to call queue selection in VF. >> The bonding/teaming logic doesn't work well for UDP flows. >> Commit b3bf5666a510 ("hv_netvsc: defer queue selection to VF") >> fixed this performance problem. >> >> Lastly, more indirection is bad in current climate. >> >> I am not completely adverse to this but it needs to be fast, simple >> and completely transparent. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization