On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:47:47 -0400 Farhan Ali <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 09/21/2018 09:28 AM, Halil Pasic wrote: > > Anyway I'm fine with swapping the old out and your new version in, > > if you prefer it that way. > > > > If you do, would you like to have a respin? Just send me a respin with something that you find useful :) (maybe a mashup of our descriptions) (while at it, you could also add the cc:stable, which I agree make sense) > > > > Regards, > > Halil > > > > I had been looking into this code recently, and shouldn't vcdev->status > (function get/set_status functions) also have a lock around it? Or is it > not possible to have a race condition on vcdev->status? I don't think so, as status is only a byte. > > Thanks > Farhan > > > >>> > >>> Let us protect the shared state using vcdev->lock. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <[email protected]> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 10 ++++++++-- > >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
