From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:05:53 +0000
> Commit 78139c94dc8c ("net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one") moved the vq
> lock to improve scalability, but introduced a possible deadlock in
> vhost-iotlb. vhost_iotlb_notify_vq() now takes vq->mutex while holding
> the device's IOTLB spinlock. And on the vhost_iotlb_miss() path, the
> spinlock is taken while holding vq->mutex.
>
> Since calling vhost_poll_queue() doesn't require any lock, avoid the
> deadlock by not taking vq->mutex.
>
> Fixes: 78139c94dc8c ("net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one")
> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com>
Applied, thank you.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
