On 12/08/2018 02:01 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 03:34:41PM +0800, Dongli Zhang wrote:
>> VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG() is deprecated. Use VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG_OFF() instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zh...@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c | 6 ++++--
>> include/uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h | 2 --
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c
>> b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c
>> index de062fb..eff9ddc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c
>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c
>> @@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ static void vp_get(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned
>> offset,
>> {
>> struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev);
>> void __iomem *ioaddr = vp_dev->ioaddr +
>> - VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG(vp_dev) + offset;
>> + VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG_OFF(vp_dev->msix_enabled) +
>> + offset;
>> u8 *ptr = buf;
>> int i;
>>
>> @@ -67,7 +68,8 @@ static void vp_set(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned
>> offset,
>> {
>> struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev);
>> void __iomem *ioaddr = vp_dev->ioaddr +
>> - VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG(vp_dev) + offset;
>> + VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG_OFF(vp_dev->msix_enabled) +
>> + offset;
>> const u8 *ptr = buf;
>> int i;
>>
>
> I agree that VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG_OFF is a better interface. So above looks
> fine.
>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h
>> b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h
>> index 90007a1..2070232 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h
>> @@ -78,8 +78,6 @@
>> /* The remaining space is defined by each driver as the per-driver
>> * configuration space */
>> #define VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG_OFF(msix_enabled) ((msix_enabled) ? 24 : 20)
>> -/* Deprecated: please use VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG_OFF instead */
>> -#define VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG(dev)
>> VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG_OFF((dev)->msix_enabled)
>>
>> /* Virtio ABI version, this must match exactly */
>> #define VIRTIO_PCI_ABI_VERSION 0
>
> This might break some userspace builds, I don't see why we should bother
> removing it. Any reason?
Apologies.
I thought about some compatibility issue for building third-party kernel module
at userspace, but did not realize it will break other userspace software builds.
I will keep the definition of VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG() and resend again.
Thank you very much!
Dongli Zhang
>
>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
