On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:20:34 +0100
Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> wrote:

> If something goes wrong in the kvm io bus handling, the virtio-ccw
> diagnose may return a negative error value in the cookie gpr.
> 
> Document this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
> Even if the virtio spec is the correct place to specify what diag 500
> subcode 3 does, we also should mention here that the cookie may be
> an error.
> 
> ---
>  Documentation/virtual/kvm/s390-diag.txt | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/s390-diag.txt 
> b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/s390-diag.txt
> index 48c4921794ed..7c52e5f8b210 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/s390-diag.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/s390-diag.txt
> @@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ Subcode 3 - virtio-ccw notification
>      identifier, it is ignored.
>  
>      After completion of the DIAGNOSE call, general register 2 may contain
> -    a 64bit identifier (in the kvm_io_bus cookie case).
> +    a 64bit identifier (in the kvm_io_bus cookie case), or a negative
> +    error value, if an internal error occurred.
>  
>      See also the virtio standard for a discussion of this hypercall.
>  

Queued.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to