On Fri, 3 May 2019 16:04:48 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 11:17:24AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:32:36 +0200
> > Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > The commit 2a2d1382fe9d ("virtio: Add improved queue allocation API")
> > > establishes a new way of allocating virtqueues (as a part of the effort
> > > that taught DMA to virtio rings).
> > > 
> > > In the future we will want virtio-ccw to use the DMA API as well.
> > > 
> > > Let us switch from the legacy method of allocating virtqueues to
> > > vring_create_virtqueue() as the first step into that direction.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com>
> > 
> > I'd vote for merging this patch right away for 5.2.
> 
> So which tree is this going through? mine?
> 

Christian, what do you think? If the whole series is supposed to go in
in one go (which I hope it is), via Martin's tree could be the simplest
route IMHO.

Regards,
Halil

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to