On 2019/10/14 下午4:17, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE might have been useful for VMCI-specific
applications, but we should use SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF for portable
applications in the future. Those socket options also work with other
address families.
I guess these sockopts are bypassed by AF_VSOCK because it doesn't use
the common skb queuing code in net/core/sock.c:(. But one day we might
migrate to it...
Stefan
+1, we should really consider to reuse the exist socket mechanism
instead of re-inventing wheels.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization