> From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarz...@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 11:56 AM > Subject: [PATCH net-next 04/14] vsock: add 'transport' member in the struct > vsock_sock > > As a preparation to support multiple transports, this patch adds the > 'transport' member at the 'struct vsock_sock'. > This new field is initialized during the creation in the > __vsock_create() function. > > This patch also renames the global 'transport' pointer to 'transport_single', > since for now we're only supporting a single transport registered at run-time. > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarz...@redhat.com> > --- > include/net/af_vsock.h | 1 + > net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > --- > 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h index > c660402b10f2..a5e1e134261d 100644 > --- a/include/net/af_vsock.h > +++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ extern spinlock_t vsock_table_lock; struct vsock_sock { > /* sk must be the first member. */ > struct sock sk; > + const struct vsock_transport *transport; > struct sockaddr_vm local_addr; > struct sockaddr_vm remote_addr; > /* Links for the global tables of bound and connected sockets. */ diff > --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c index > 2f2582fb7fdd..c3a14f853eb0 100644 > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static struct proto vsock_proto = { > */ > #define VSOCK_DEFAULT_CONNECT_TIMEOUT (2 * HZ) > > -static const struct vsock_transport *transport; > +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_single; > static DEFINE_MUTEX(vsock_register_mutex); > > /**** UTILS ****/ > @@ -408,7 +408,9 @@ static bool vsock_is_pending(struct sock *sk) > > static int vsock_send_shutdown(struct sock *sk, int mode) { > - return transport->shutdown(vsock_sk(sk), mode); > + struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk); > + > + return vsk->transport->shutdown(vsk, mode); > } > > static void vsock_pending_work(struct work_struct *work) @@ -518,7 > +520,7 @@ static int __vsock_bind_stream(struct vsock_sock *vsk, static int > __vsock_bind_dgram(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > struct sockaddr_vm *addr) > { > - return transport->dgram_bind(vsk, addr); > + return vsk->transport->dgram_bind(vsk, addr); > } > > static int __vsock_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr_vm *addr) @@ - > 536,7 +538,7 @@ static int __vsock_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr_vm > *addr) > * like AF_INET prevents binding to a non-local IP address (in most > * cases), we only allow binding to the local CID. > */ > - cid = transport->get_local_cid(); > + cid = vsk->transport->get_local_cid(); > if (addr->svm_cid != cid && addr->svm_cid != VMADDR_CID_ANY) > return -EADDRNOTAVAIL; > > @@ -586,6 +588,7 @@ struct sock *__vsock_create(struct net *net, > sk->sk_type = type; > > vsk = vsock_sk(sk); > + vsk->transport = transport_single; > vsock_addr_init(&vsk->local_addr, VMADDR_CID_ANY, > VMADDR_PORT_ANY); > vsock_addr_init(&vsk->remote_addr, VMADDR_CID_ANY, > VMADDR_PORT_ANY); > > @@ -616,7 +619,7 @@ struct sock *__vsock_create(struct net *net, > vsk->connect_timeout = > VSOCK_DEFAULT_CONNECT_TIMEOUT; > } > > - if (transport->init(vsk, psk) < 0) { > + if (vsk->transport->init(vsk, psk) < 0) { > sk_free(sk); > return NULL; > } > @@ -641,7 +644,7 @@ static void __vsock_release(struct sock *sk, int level) > /* The release call is supposed to use lock_sock_nested() > * rather than lock_sock(), if a sock lock should be acquired. > */ > - transport->release(vsk); > + vsk->transport->release(vsk); > > /* When "level" is SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING, use the nested > * version to avoid the warning "possible recursive locking > @@ -670,7 +673,7 @@ static void vsock_sk_destruct(struct sock *sk) { > struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk); > > - transport->destruct(vsk); > + vsk->transport->destruct(vsk); > > /* When clearing these addresses, there's no need to set the family > and > * possibly register the address family with the kernel. > @@ -694,13 +697,13 @@ static int vsock_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk, > struct sk_buff *skb) > > s64 vsock_stream_has_data(struct vsock_sock *vsk) { > - return transport->stream_has_data(vsk); > + return vsk->transport->stream_has_data(vsk); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_stream_has_data); > > s64 vsock_stream_has_space(struct vsock_sock *vsk) { > - return transport->stream_has_space(vsk); > + return vsk->transport->stream_has_space(vsk); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_stream_has_space); > > @@ -869,6 +872,7 @@ static __poll_t vsock_poll(struct file *file, struct > socket *sock, > mask |= EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM | > EPOLLWRBAND; > > } else if (sock->type == SOCK_STREAM) { > + const struct vsock_transport *transport = vsk->transport; > lock_sock(sk); > > /* Listening sockets that have connections in their accept > @@ -944,6 +948,7 @@ static int vsock_dgram_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, > struct msghdr *msg, > struct sock *sk; > struct vsock_sock *vsk; > struct sockaddr_vm *remote_addr; > + const struct vsock_transport *transport; > > if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_OOB) > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > @@ -952,6 +957,7 @@ static int vsock_dgram_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, > struct msghdr *msg, > err = 0; > sk = sock->sk; > vsk = vsock_sk(sk); > + transport = vsk->transport; > > lock_sock(sk); > > @@ -1036,8 +1042,8 @@ static int vsock_dgram_connect(struct socket > *sock, > if (err) > goto out; > > - if (!transport->dgram_allow(remote_addr->svm_cid, > - remote_addr->svm_port)) { > + if (!vsk->transport->dgram_allow(remote_addr->svm_cid, > + remote_addr->svm_port)) { > err = -EINVAL; > goto out; > } > @@ -1053,7 +1059,9 @@ static int vsock_dgram_connect(struct socket > *sock, static int vsock_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr > *msg, > size_t len, int flags) > { > - return transport->dgram_dequeue(vsock_sk(sock->sk), msg, len, > flags); > + struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sock->sk); > + > + return vsk->transport->dgram_dequeue(vsk, msg, len, flags); > } > > static const struct proto_ops vsock_dgram_ops = { @@ -1079,6 +1087,8 @@ > static const struct proto_ops vsock_dgram_ops = { > > static int vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(struct vsock_sock *vsk) { > + const struct vsock_transport *transport = vsk->transport; > + > if (!transport->cancel_pkt) > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > @@ -1115,6 +1125,7 @@ static int vsock_stream_connect(struct socket > *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, > int err; > struct sock *sk; > struct vsock_sock *vsk; > + const struct vsock_transport *transport; > struct sockaddr_vm *remote_addr; > long timeout; > DEFINE_WAIT(wait); > @@ -1122,6 +1133,7 @@ static int vsock_stream_connect(struct socket > *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, > err = 0; > sk = sock->sk; > vsk = vsock_sk(sk); > + transport = vsk->transport; > > lock_sock(sk); > > @@ -1365,6 +1377,7 @@ static int vsock_stream_setsockopt(struct socket > *sock, > int err; > struct sock *sk; > struct vsock_sock *vsk; > + const struct vsock_transport *transport; > u64 val; > > if (level != AF_VSOCK) > @@ -1385,6 +1398,7 @@ static int vsock_stream_setsockopt(struct socket > *sock, > err = 0; > sk = sock->sk; > vsk = vsock_sk(sk); > + transport = vsk->transport; > > lock_sock(sk); > > @@ -1442,6 +1456,7 @@ static int vsock_stream_getsockopt(struct socket > *sock, > int len; > struct sock *sk; > struct vsock_sock *vsk; > + const struct vsock_transport *transport; > u64 val; > > if (level != AF_VSOCK) > @@ -1465,6 +1480,7 @@ static int vsock_stream_getsockopt(struct socket > *sock, > err = 0; > sk = sock->sk; > vsk = vsock_sk(sk); > + transport = vsk->transport; > > switch (optname) { > case SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE: > @@ -1509,6 +1525,7 @@ static int vsock_stream_sendmsg(struct socket > *sock, struct msghdr *msg, { > struct sock *sk; > struct vsock_sock *vsk; > + const struct vsock_transport *transport; > ssize_t total_written; > long timeout; > int err; > @@ -1517,6 +1534,7 @@ static int vsock_stream_sendmsg(struct socket > *sock, struct msghdr *msg, > > sk = sock->sk; > vsk = vsock_sk(sk); > + transport = vsk->transport; > total_written = 0; > err = 0; > > @@ -1648,6 +1666,7 @@ vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct > msghdr *msg, size_t len, { > struct sock *sk; > struct vsock_sock *vsk; > + const struct vsock_transport *transport; > int err; > size_t target; > ssize_t copied; > @@ -1658,6 +1677,7 @@ vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct > msghdr *msg, size_t len, > > sk = sock->sk; > vsk = vsock_sk(sk); > + transport = vsk->transport; > err = 0; > > lock_sock(sk); > @@ -1872,7 +1892,7 @@ static long vsock_dev_do_ioctl(struct file *filp, > > switch (cmd) { > case IOCTL_VM_SOCKETS_GET_LOCAL_CID: > - if (put_user(transport->get_local_cid(), p) != 0) > + if (put_user(transport_single->get_local_cid(), p) != 0) > retval = -EFAULT; > break; > > @@ -1919,7 +1939,7 @@ int __vsock_core_init(const struct vsock_transport > *t, struct module *owner) > if (err) > return err; > > - if (transport) { > + if (transport_single) { > err = -EBUSY; > goto err_busy; > } > @@ -1928,7 +1948,7 @@ int __vsock_core_init(const struct vsock_transport > *t, struct module *owner) > * unload while there are open sockets. > */ > vsock_proto.owner = owner; > - transport = t; > + transport_single = t; > > vsock_device.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR; > err = misc_register(&vsock_device); > @@ -1958,7 +1978,7 @@ int __vsock_core_init(const struct vsock_transport > *t, struct module *owner) > err_deregister_misc: > misc_deregister(&vsock_device); > err_reset_transport: > - transport = NULL; > + transport_single = NULL; > err_busy: > mutex_unlock(&vsock_register_mutex); > return err; > @@ -1975,7 +1995,7 @@ void vsock_core_exit(void) > > /* We do not want the assignment below re-ordered. */ > mb(); > - transport = NULL; > + transport_single = NULL; > > mutex_unlock(&vsock_register_mutex); > } > @@ -1986,7 +2006,7 @@ const struct vsock_transport > *vsock_core_get_transport(void) > /* vsock_register_mutex not taken since only the transport uses this > * function and only while registered. > */ > - return transport; > + return transport_single; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_core_get_transport); > > -- > 2.21.0
Reviewed-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhan...@vmware.com> _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
