On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 01:28:08AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 12/12/19 00:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> @@ -405,6 +405,9 @@ static int virtblk_getgeo(struct block_device *bd,
> >> struct hd_geometry *geo)
> >>
> >> static const struct block_device_operations virtblk_fops = {
> >> .ioctl = virtblk_ioctl,
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> >> + .compat_ioctl = blkdev_compat_ptr_ioctl,
> >> +#endif
> >> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> >> .getgeo = virtblk_getgeo,
> >> };
> > Hmm - is virtio blk lumped in with scsi things intentionally?
>
> I think it's because the only ioctl for virtio-blk is SG_IO.
Oh right, I forgot about that one ...
> It makes
> sense to lump it in with scsi, but I wouldn't mind getting rid of
> CONFIG_VIRTIO_BLK_SCSI altogether.
>
> Paolo
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
