On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 08:31:18PM +0200, Eugenio Pérez wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <[email protected]>

I'm still a bit puzzled by this one - could you
explain what the rationale here is?

> ---
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/virtio/linux/virtio.h  |  2 ++
>  tools/virtio/virtio_test.c   | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 58b96baa8d48..f9153a381f72 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -1810,6 +1810,35 @@ int virtqueue_add_inbuf_ctx(struct virtqueue *vq,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_add_inbuf_ctx);
>  
> +#ifndef __KERNEL__
> +
> +/**
> + * virtqueue_reset_free_head - Reset to 0 the members of split ring.
> + * @vq: Virtqueue to reset.
> + *
> + * At this moment, is only meant for debug the ring index change, do not use
> + * in production.
> + */
> +void virtqueue_reset_free_head(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> +{
> +     struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> +
> +     // vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> +     vq->num_added = 0;
> +
> +     vq->split.queue_size_in_bytes = 0;
> +     vq->split.avail_flags_shadow = 0;
> +     vq->split.avail_idx_shadow = 0;
> +
> +     memset(vq->split.desc_state, 0, vq->split.vring.num *
> +                     sizeof(struct vring_desc_state_split));
> +
> +     vq->free_head = 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_reset_free_head);
> +
> +#endif
> +
>  /**
>   * virtqueue_kick_prepare - first half of split virtqueue_kick call.
>   * @_vq: the struct virtqueue
> diff --git a/tools/virtio/linux/virtio.h b/tools/virtio/linux/virtio.h
> index b751350d4ce8..5d33eab6b814 100644
> --- a/tools/virtio/linux/virtio.h
> +++ b/tools/virtio/linux/virtio.h
> @@ -65,4 +65,6 @@ struct virtqueue *vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int index,
>                                     const char *name);
>  void vring_del_virtqueue(struct virtqueue *vq);
>  
> +void virtqueue_reset_free_head(struct virtqueue *vq);
> +
>  #endif
> diff --git a/tools/virtio/virtio_test.c b/tools/virtio/virtio_test.c
> index 93d81cd64ba0..bf21ece30594 100644
> --- a/tools/virtio/virtio_test.c
> +++ b/tools/virtio/virtio_test.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ struct vdev_info {
>  
>  static const struct vhost_vring_file no_backend = { .fd = -1 },
>                                    backend = { .fd = 1 };
> +static const struct vhost_vring_state null_state = {};
>  
>  bool vq_notify(struct virtqueue *vq)
>  {
> @@ -218,10 +219,33 @@ static void run_test(struct vdev_info *dev, struct 
> vq_info *vq,
>                       }
>  
>                       if (reset) {
> +                             struct vhost_vring_state s = { .index = 0 };
> +                             int i;
> +                             vq->vring.avail->idx = 0;
> +                             vq->vq->num_free = vq->vring.num;
> +
> +                             // Put everything in free lists.
> +                             for (i = 0; i < vq->vring.num-1; i++)
> +                                     vq->vring.desc[i].next =
> +                                             cpu_to_virtio16(&dev->vdev,
> +                                                             i + 1);
> +                             vq->vring.desc[vq->vring.num-1].next = 0;


Poking at vq descriptors like this seems fragile.
I think this calls for a better API that handles everything
internally.


> +                             virtqueue_reset_free_head(vq->vq);
> +
> +                             r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_GET_VRING_BASE,
> +                                       &s);
> +                             assert(!r);
> +
> +                             s.num = 0;
> +                             r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_VRING_BASE,
> +                                       &null_state);
> +                             assert(!r);
> +
>                               r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_TEST_SET_BACKEND,
>                                         &backend);
>                               assert(!r);
>  
> +                             started = completed;
>                                  while (completed > next_reset)
>                                       next_reset += completed;
>                       }
> @@ -243,7 +267,9 @@ static void run_test(struct vdev_info *dev, struct 
> vq_info *vq,
>       test = 0;
>       r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_TEST_RUN, &test);
>       assert(r >= 0);
> -     fprintf(stderr, "spurious wakeups: 0x%llx\n", spurious);
> +     fprintf(stderr,
> +             "spurious wakeups: 0x%llx started=0x%lx completed=0x%lx\n",
> +             spurious, started, completed);
>  }
>  
>  const char optstring[] = "h";
> -- 
> 2.18.1

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to