On 2020-07-09 10:57, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu,  9 Jul 2020 10:39:19 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmo...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

If protected virtualization is active on s390, the virtio queues are
not accessible to the host, unless VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM has been
negotiated. Use the new arch_validate_virtio_features() interface to
fail probe if that's not the case, preventing a host error on access
attempt

Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmo...@linux.ibm.com>
---
  arch/s390/mm/init.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/init.c b/arch/s390/mm/init.c
index 6dc7c3b60ef6..b8e6f90117da 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/init.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
  #include <asm/kasan.h>
  #include <asm/dma-mapping.h>
  #include <asm/uv.h>
+#include <linux/virtio_config.h>
pgd_t swapper_pg_dir[PTRS_PER_PGD] __section(.bss..swapper_pg_dir); @@ -161,6 +162,32 @@ bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
        return is_prot_virt_guest();
  }
+/*
+ * arch_validate_virtio_features
+ * @dev: the VIRTIO device being added
+ *
+ * Return an error if required features are missing on a guest running
+ * with protected virtualization.
+ */
+int arch_validate_virtio_features(struct virtio_device *dev)
+{
+       if (!is_prot_virt_guest())
+               return 0;
+
+       if (!virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
+               dev_warn(&dev->dev, "device must provide VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1\n");

I'd probably use "legacy virtio not supported with protected
virtualization".

+               return -ENODEV;
+       }
+
+       if (!virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM)) {
+               dev_warn(&dev->dev,
+                        "device must provide VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM\n");

"support for limited memory access required for protected
virtualization"

?

Mentioning the feature flag is shorter in both cases, though.

And I think easier to look for in case of debugging purpose.
I change it if there is more demands.


+               return -ENODEV;
+       }
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
  /* protected virtualization */
  static void pv_init(void)
  {

Either way,

Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com>


Thanks,
Pierre


--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to