On 09/07/20 16:46, Xianting Tian wrote:
> kmem_cache_destroy can correctly handle null pointer parameter,
> so there is no need to check if the parameter is null before
> calling kmem_cache_destroy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <xianting_t...@126.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> index bfec84a..5bc288f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> @@ -1007,10 +1007,8 @@ static int __init init(void)
>               mempool_destroy(virtscsi_cmd_pool);
>               virtscsi_cmd_pool = NULL;
>       }
> -     if (virtscsi_cmd_cache) {
> -             kmem_cache_destroy(virtscsi_cmd_cache);
> -             virtscsi_cmd_cache = NULL;
> -     }
> +     kmem_cache_destroy(virtscsi_cmd_cache);
> +     virtscsi_cmd_cache = NULL;
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> 

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to