From: Mihai Donțu <mdo...@bitdefender.com>

This should make the code more readable.

Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu <mdo...@bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <ala...@bitdefender.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index fed661eb65a7..cd498ece8b52 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -5361,8 +5361,8 @@ static int handle_ept_violation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
                        EPT_VIOLATION_EXECUTABLE))
                      ? PFERR_PRESENT_MASK : 0;
 
-       error_code |= (exit_qualification & 0x100) != 0 ?
-              PFERR_GUEST_FINAL_MASK : PFERR_GUEST_PAGE_MASK;
+       error_code |= (exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_GVA_TRANSLATED)
+                     ? PFERR_GUEST_FINAL_MASK : PFERR_GUEST_PAGE_MASK;
 
        vcpu->arch.exit_qualification = exit_qualification;
        return kvm_mmu_page_fault(vcpu, gpa, error_code, NULL, 0);
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to