On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:38:13AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:21:29AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:00:35AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > OK so this looks good. Can you pls repost with the minor tweak
> > > suggested and all acks included, and I will queue this?
> >
> > My NACK still stands, as long as a few questions are open:
> >
> > 1) The format used here will be the same as in the ACPI table? I
> > think the answer to this questions must be Yes, so this leads
> > to the real question:
>
> I am not sure it's a must.
It is, having only one parser for the ACPI and MMIO descriptions was one
of the selling points for MMIO in past discussions and I think it makes
sense to keep them in sync.
> We can always tweak the parser if there are slight differences
> between ACPI and virtio formats.
There is no guarantee that there only need to be "tweaks" until the
ACPI table format is stablized.
Regards,
Joerg
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
