"Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 08:25:27AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Eugenio Pérez <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > The -1 assumes that all devices with no cvq have an spare vq allocated
>> > for them, but with no offer of VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ. This may not be the
>> > case, and the device may have a pair number of queues.
>> ^^^^
>> even
>>
>> I know, I know, I am Spanish myself O:-)
>
> Nobody expects the Spanish ;)
O:-)
>> int main(void)
>> {
>> int i = 7;
>> i &= -1ULL;
>
> Stefano's patch has ~1ULL , not -1ULL here.
>
Stupid eyes.
Thanks, Juan.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
