On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 06:29:58PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
vhost_poll_flush() is a simple wrapper around vhost_work_dev_flush().
It gives wrong impression that we are doing some work over vhost_poll,
while in fact it flushes vhost_poll->dev.
It only complicate understanding of the code and leads to mistakes
like flushing the same vhost_dev several times in a row.

Just remove vhost_poll_flush() and call vhost_work_dev_flush() directly.

Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <a...@yandex-team.com>
---
drivers/vhost/net.c   |  4 ++--
drivers/vhost/test.c  |  2 +-
drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 12 ++----------
drivers/vhost/vsock.c |  2 +-
4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index 28ef323882fb..11221f6d11b8 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -1375,8 +1375,8 @@ static void vhost_net_stop(struct vhost_net *n, struct 
socket **tx_sock,

static void vhost_net_flush_vq(struct vhost_net *n, int index)
{
-       vhost_poll_flush(n->poll + index);
-       vhost_poll_flush(&n->vqs[index].vq.poll);
+       vhost_work_dev_flush(n->poll[index].dev);
+       vhost_work_dev_flush(n->vqs[index].vq.poll.dev);
}

static void vhost_net_flush(struct vhost_net *n)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/test.c b/drivers/vhost/test.c
index a09dedc79f68..1a8ab1d8cb1c 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/test.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/test.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static void vhost_test_stop(struct vhost_test *n, void 
**privatep)

static void vhost_test_flush_vq(struct vhost_test *n, int index)
{
-       vhost_poll_flush(&n->vqs[index].poll);
+       vhost_work_dev_flush(n->vqs[index].poll.dev);
}

static void vhost_test_flush(struct vhost_test *n)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index 59edb5a1ffe2..ca088481da0e 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -245,14 +245,6 @@ void vhost_work_dev_flush(struct vhost_dev *dev)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_work_dev_flush);

-/* Flush any work that has been scheduled. When calling this, don't hold any
- * locks that are also used by the callback. */
-void vhost_poll_flush(struct vhost_poll *poll)
-{
-       vhost_work_dev_flush(poll->dev);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_poll_flush);
-
void vhost_work_queue(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_work *work)
{
        if (!dev->worker)
@@ -663,7 +655,7 @@ void vhost_dev_stop(struct vhost_dev *dev)
        for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i) {
                if (dev->vqs[i]->kick && dev->vqs[i]->handle_kick) {
                        vhost_poll_stop(&dev->vqs[i]->poll);
-                       vhost_poll_flush(&dev->vqs[i]->poll);
+                       vhost_work_dev_flush(dev->vqs[i]->poll.dev);

Not related to this patch, but while looking at vhost-vsock I'm wondering if we can do the same here in vhost_dev_stop(), I mean move vhost_work_dev_flush() outside the loop and and call it once. (In another patch eventually)

Stefano

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to