On 11/30/2021 1:48 AM, Eli Cohen wrote:
Allow to configure the max virtqueues for a device.
Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <[email protected]>
---
drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
include/linux/vdpa.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c
index 7332a74a4b00..e185ec2ee851 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c
@@ -480,7 +480,8 @@ vdpa_nl_cmd_mgmtdev_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg, struct
netlink_callback *cb)
}
#define VDPA_DEV_NET_ATTRS_MASK ((1 << VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MACADDR) | \
- (1 << VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MTU))
+ (1 << VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MTU) | \
+ (1 << VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MAX_VQP))
It seems VDPA_ATTR_DEV_MAX_VQS (u32) is what you want (# of data
virtqueues instead of # of data virtqueue pairs)? Not sure what's
possible use of VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MAX_VQP, was it to dump/display
the config space max_virtqueue_pairs value (u16, 1-32768) for
virtio-net? Why there's such quasi-duplicate attribute introduced in the
first place?
Not even sure VDPA_ATTR_DEV_MAX_VQS by definition should include other
virtqueues as well: such as control virtqueue or event virtqueue. Hence
the name will be more applicable to vdpa devices of other virtio type
than just virtio-net. Otherwise I would think this attribute is slightly
misnamed (max_data_vqs might be a proper name).
static int vdpa_nl_cmd_dev_add_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
{
@@ -506,6 +507,19 @@ static int vdpa_nl_cmd_dev_add_set_doit(struct sk_buff
*skb, struct genl_info *i
nla_get_u16(nl_attrs[VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MTU]);
config.mask |= (1 << VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MTU);
}
+ if (nl_attrs[VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MAX_VQP]) {
+ config.max_virtqueues =
nla_get_u16(nl_attrs[VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MAX_VQP]);
+ if (config.max_virtqueues < 2) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "At least two virtqueues
are required");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ if ((config.max_virtqueues - 1) & config.max_virtqueues) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack,
+ "Must provide power of two number of
virtqueues");
Why there's such limitation for the number of vDPA virtqueues? I thought
the software virtio doesn't have this limitation (power of two).
-Siwei
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ config.mask |= BIT_ULL(VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MAX_VQP);
+ }
/* Skip checking capability if user didn't prefer to configure any
* device networking attributes. It is likely that user might have used
diff --git a/include/linux/vdpa.h b/include/linux/vdpa.h
index c3011ccda430..2f0b09c6d1ae 100644
--- a/include/linux/vdpa.h
+++ b/include/linux/vdpa.h
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct vdpa_dev_set_config {
u16 mtu;
} net;
u64 mask;
+ u16 max_virtqueues;
};
/**
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
