On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 10:45 AM Mike Christie
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Andrey Ryabinin <[email protected]>
>
> vhost_vsock_flush() calls vhost_work_dev_flush(vsock->vqs[i].poll.dev)
> before vhost_work_dev_flush(&vsock->dev). This seems pointless
> as vsock->vqs[i].poll.dev is the same as &vsock->dev and several flushes
> in a row doesn't do anything useful, one is just enough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 5 -----
>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> index 2339587bcd31..1f38160b249d 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> @@ -703,11 +703,6 @@ static int vhost_vsock_dev_open(struct inode *inode, 
> struct file *file)
>
>  static void vhost_vsock_flush(struct vhost_vsock *vsock)
>  {
> -       int i;
> -
> -       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vsock->vqs); i++)
> -               if (vsock->vqs[i].handle_kick)
> -                       vhost_work_dev_flush(vsock->vqs[i].poll.dev);
>         vhost_work_dev_flush(&vsock->dev);
>  }

Is this better to be consistent with vhost-net so that we can simply
remove the vhost_vsock_flush() wrapper here.

Thanks

>
> --
> 2.25.1
>

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to