On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 10:41:29AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > In vhost_enable_notify() we enable the notifications and we read > the avail index to check if new buffers have become available in > the meantime. > > We do not update the cached avail index value, so when the device > will call vhost_get_vq_desc(), it will find the old value in the > cache and it will read the avail index again. > > It would be better to refresh the cache every time we read avail > index, so let's change vhost_enable_notify() caching the value in > `avail_idx` and compare it with `last_avail_idx` to check if there > are new buffers available. > > We don't expect a significant performance boost because > the above path is not very common, indeed vhost_enable_notify() > is often called with unlikely(), expecting that avail index has > not been updated. > > We ran virtio-test/vhost-test and noticed minimal improvement as > expected. To stress the patch more, we modified vhost_test.ko to > call vhost_enable_notify()/vhost_disable_notify() on every cycle > when calling vhost_get_vq_desc(); in this case we observed a more > evident improvement, with a reduction of the test execution time > of about 3.7%. > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]> > --- > v3 > - reworded commit description [Stefan] > --- > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c > index 59edb5a1ffe2..07363dff559e 100644 > --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c > @@ -2543,8 +2543,9 @@ bool vhost_enable_notify(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct > vhost_virtqueue *vq) > &vq->avail->idx, r); > return false; > } > + vq->avail_idx = vhost16_to_cpu(vq, avail_idx); > > - return vhost16_to_cpu(vq, avail_idx) != vq->avail_idx; > + return vq->avail_idx != vq->last_avail_idx; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_enable_notify);
This changes behavior (fixes a bug?): previously the function returned false when called with avail buffers still pending (vq->last_avail_idx < vq->avail_idx). Now it returns true because we compare against vq->last_avail_idx and I think that's reasonable. Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
