On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 02:31:21PM +0900, Suwan Kim wrote:
> This patch supports polling I/O via virtio-blk driver. Polling
> feature is enabled by module parameter "num_poll_queues" and it
> sets dedicated polling queues for virtio-blk. This patch improves
> the polling I/O throughput and latency.
> 
> The virtio-blk driver doesn't not have a poll function and a poll
> queue and it has been operating in interrupt driven method even if
> the polling function is called in the upper layer.
> 
> virtio-blk polling is implemented upon 'batched completion' of block
> layer. virtblk_poll() queues completed request to io_comp_batch->req_list
> and later, virtblk_complete_batch() calls unmap function and ends
> the requests in batch.
> 
> virtio-blk reads the number of poll queues from module parameter
> "num_poll_queues". If VM sets queue parameter as below,
> ("num-queues=N" [QEMU property], "num_poll_queues=M" [module parameter])
> It allocates N virtqueues to virtio_blk->vqs[N] and it uses [0..(N-M-1)]
> as default queues and [(N-M)..(N-1)] as poll queues. Unlike the default
> queues, the poll queues have no callback function.
> 
> Regarding HW-SW queue mapping, the default queue mapping uses the
> existing method that condsiders MSI irq vector. But the poll queue
> doesn't have an irq, so it uses the regular blk-mq cpu mapping.
> 
> For verifying the improvement, I did Fio polling I/O performance test
> with io_uring engine with the options below.
> (io_uring, hipri, randread, direct=1, bs=512, iodepth=64 numjobs=N)
> I set 4 vcpu and 4 virtio-blk queues - 2 default queues and 2 poll
> queues for VM.
> 
> As a result, IOPS and average latency improved about 10%.
> 
> Test result:
> 
> - Fio io_uring poll without virtio-blk poll support
>       -- numjobs=1 : IOPS = 339K, avg latency = 188.33us
>       -- numjobs=2 : IOPS = 367K, avg latency = 347.33us
>       -- numjobs=4 : IOPS = 383K, avg latency = 682.06us
> 
> - Fio io_uring poll with virtio-blk poll support
>       -- numjobs=1 : IOPS = 385K, avg latency = 165.94us
>       -- numjobs=2 : IOPS = 408K, avg latency = 313.28us
>       -- numjobs=4 : IOPS = 424K, avg latency = 613.05us
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suwan Kim <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> index 8c415be86732..712579dcd3cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(num_request_queues,
>                "0 for no limit. "
>                "Values > nr_cpu_ids truncated to nr_cpu_ids.");
>  
> +static unsigned int poll_queues;
> +module_param(poll_queues, uint, 0644);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(poll_queues, "The number of dedicated virtqueues for 
> polling I/O");
> +
>  static int major;
>  static DEFINE_IDA(vd_index_ida);
>  
> @@ -81,6 +85,7 @@ struct virtio_blk {
>  
>       /* num of vqs */
>       int num_vqs;
> +     int io_queues[HCTX_MAX_TYPES];
>       struct virtio_blk_vq *vqs;
>  };
>  
> @@ -548,6 +553,7 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
>       const char **names;
>       struct virtqueue **vqs;
>       unsigned short num_vqs;
> +     unsigned int num_poll_vqs;
>       struct virtio_device *vdev = vblk->vdev;
>       struct irq_affinity desc = { 0, };
>  
> @@ -556,6 +562,7 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
>                                  &num_vqs);
>       if (err)
>               num_vqs = 1;
> +
>       if (!err && !num_vqs) {
>               dev_err(&vdev->dev, "MQ advertised but zero queues reported\n");
>               return -EINVAL;
> @@ -565,6 +572,18 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
>                       min_not_zero(num_request_queues, nr_cpu_ids),
>                       num_vqs);
>  
> +     num_poll_vqs = min_t(unsigned int, poll_queues, num_vqs - 1);
> +
> +     memset(vblk->io_queues, 0, sizeof(int) * HCTX_MAX_TYPES);
> +     vblk->io_queues[HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT] = num_vqs - num_poll_vqs;
> +     vblk->io_queues[HCTX_TYPE_READ] = 0;
> +     vblk->io_queues[HCTX_TYPE_POLL] = num_poll_vqs;
> +
> +     dev_info(&vdev->dev, "%d/%d/%d default/read/poll queues\n",
> +                             vblk->io_queues[HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT],
> +                             vblk->io_queues[HCTX_TYPE_READ],
> +                             vblk->io_queues[HCTX_TYPE_POLL]);
> +
>       vblk->vqs = kmalloc_array(num_vqs, sizeof(*vblk->vqs), GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (!vblk->vqs)
>               return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -578,8 +597,13 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
>       }
>  
>       for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) {
> +             if (i < num_vqs - num_poll_vqs) {
> +                     callbacks[i] = virtblk_done;
> +                     snprintf(vblk->vqs[i].name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "req.%d", i);
> +             } else {
> +                     callbacks[i] = NULL;
> +                     snprintf(vblk->vqs[i].name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "req_poll.%d", 
> i);
> +             }
>               names[i] = vblk->vqs[i].name;

This would look a little cleaner with two loops:

        for (i = 0; i < num_vqs - num_poll_vqs; i++) {
                callbacks[i] = virtblk_done;
                snprintf(vblk->vqs[i].name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "req.%d", i);
                names[i] = vblk->vqs[i].name;
        }
        for (; i < num_vqs; i++) {
                callbacks[i] = NULL;
                snprintf(vblk->vqs[i].name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "req_poll.%d", i);
                names[i] = vblk->vqs[i].name;
        }

> +
> +             if (map->nr_queues == 0)
> +                     continue;
> +
> +             /*
> +              * Regular queues have interrupts and hence CPU affinity is
> +              * defined by the core virtio code, but polling queues have
> +              * no interrupts so we let the block layer assign CPU affinity.
> +              */
> +             if (i == HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT)

I'd check for
                i != HCTX_TYPE_POLL

here instead to make the check a little more explicit and future proof
for the potential addition of read queues (which would be a Linux only
change without hypervisor or spec changes).  In fact you might as well
add that support now as doing it is completely trivial once a driver
supports multiple map types.

> +static void virtblk_complete_batch(struct io_comp_batch *iob)
> +{
> +     struct request *req;
> +     struct virtblk_req *vbr;
> +
> +     rq_list_for_each(&iob->req_list, req) {
> +             vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
> +             virtblk_unmap_data(req, vbr);
> +             virtblk_cleanup_cmd(req);

vbr is only used ones, so why not just:

                virtblk_unmap_data(req, blk_mq_rq_to_pdu);
?

Or even better add a cleanup patch to just remove the vbr argument to
virtblk_unmap_data as it is not needed at all.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to