> From: Jason Wang <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 4:32 AM
> 
> 在 2022/5/18 07:03, Parav Pandit 写道:
> >>> And regarding vduse_dev_release() and existing empty release
> >>> function,
> >> they can be dynamically allocated.
> >>> This is because they are really the struct device.
> >> I do not understand this statement, sorry.
> > It was bad sentence, my bad.
> >
> > What I wanted to say is, probably better explained with real patch below.
> > In context of [1], struct vduse_mgmtdev empty release function can be
> avoided by below inline patch [2].
> >
> > [1]https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-virtualization/msg56371.html
> >
> > [2] patch:
> 
> 
> Ok, if we go this way (looks more like mdev_parent). I think we need at least
> rename the vdpa_mgmt_device, maybe vdpa_parent (like mdev_parent)?
> 
It can be. 
Parent is also a device. So...
Since there are no further comments on the inline patch, I will send it as 
separate patch this week.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to