On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 05:03:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We try using cancel_delayed_work_sync() to prevent the work from
> enabling NAPI. This is insufficient since we don't disable the the
> source the scheduling

can't parse this sentence

> of the refill work. This means an NAPI

what do you mean "an NAPI"? a NAPI poll callback?

> after
> cancel_delayed_work_sync() can schedule the refill work then can
> re-enable the NAPI that leads to use-after-free [1].
> 
> Since the work can enable NAPI, we can't simply disable NAPI before
> calling cancel_delayed_work_sync(). So fix this by introducing a
> dedicated boolean to control whether or not the work could be
> scheduled from NAPI.
> 
> [1]
> ==================================================================
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in refill_work+0x43/0xd4
> Read of size 2 at addr ffff88810562c92e by task kworker/2:1/42
> 
> CPU: 2 PID: 42 Comm: kworker/2:1 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc1+ #480
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 
> rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
> Workqueue: events refill_work
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44
>  print_report.cold+0xbb/0x6ac
>  ? _printk+0xad/0xde
>  ? refill_work+0x43/0xd4
>  kasan_report+0xa8/0x130
>  ? refill_work+0x43/0xd4
>  refill_work+0x43/0xd4
>  process_one_work+0x43d/0x780
>  worker_thread+0x2a0/0x6f0
>  ? process_one_work+0x780/0x780
>  kthread+0x167/0x1a0
>  ? kthread_exit+0x50/0x50
>  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
>  </TASK>
> ...
> 
> Fixes: b2baed69e605c ("virtio_net: set/cancel work on ndo_open/ndo_stop")
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index db05b5e930be..21bf1e5c81ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -251,6 +251,12 @@ struct virtnet_info {
>       /* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */
>       bool affinity_hint_set;
>  
> +     /* Is refill work enabled? */
> +     bool refill_work_enabled;
> +
> +     /* The lock to synchronize the access to refill_work_enabled */
> +     spinlock_t refill_lock;
> +
>       /* CPU hotplug instances for online & dead */
>       struct hlist_node node;
>       struct hlist_node node_dead;
> @@ -348,6 +354,20 @@ static struct page *get_a_page(struct receive_queue *rq, 
> gfp_t gfp_mask)
>       return p;
>  }
>  
> +static void enable_refill_work(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> +{
> +     spin_lock(&vi->refill_lock);
> +     vi->refill_work_enabled = true;
> +     spin_unlock(&vi->refill_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void disable_refill_work(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> +{
> +     spin_lock(&vi->refill_lock);
> +     vi->refill_work_enabled = false;
> +     spin_unlock(&vi->refill_lock);
> +}
> +
>  static void virtqueue_napi_schedule(struct napi_struct *napi,
>                                   struct virtqueue *vq)
>  {
> @@ -1527,8 +1547,12 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, 
> int budget,
>       }
>  
>       if (rq->vq->num_free > min((unsigned int)budget, 
> virtqueue_get_vring_size(rq->vq)) / 2) {
> -             if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_ATOMIC))
> -                     schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> +             if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_ATOMIC)) {
> +                     spin_lock(&vi->refill_lock);
> +                     if (vi->refill_work_enabled)
> +                             schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> +                     spin_unlock(&vi->refill_lock);
> +             }
>       }
>  
>       u64_stats_update_begin(&rq->stats.syncp);
> @@ -1651,6 +1675,8 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
>       struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
>       int i, err;
>  
> +     enable_refill_work(vi);
> +
>       for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>               if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
>                       /* Make sure we have some buffers: if oom use wq. */
> @@ -2033,6 +2059,8 @@ static int virtnet_close(struct net_device *dev)
>       struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
>       int i;
>  
> +     /* Make sure NAPI doesn't schedule refill work */
> +     disable_refill_work(vi);
>       /* Make sure refill_work doesn't re-enable napi! */
>       cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>  
> @@ -2776,6 +2804,9 @@ static void virtnet_freeze_down(struct virtio_device 
> *vdev)
>       netif_tx_lock_bh(vi->dev);
>       netif_device_detach(vi->dev);
>       netif_tx_unlock_bh(vi->dev);
> +     /* Make sure NAPI doesn't schedule refill work */
> +     disable_refill_work(vi);
> +     /* Make sure refill_work doesn't re-enable napi! */
>       cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>  
>       if (netif_running(vi->dev)) {
> @@ -2799,6 +2830,8 @@ static int virtnet_restore_up(struct virtio_device 
> *vdev)
>  
>       virtio_device_ready(vdev);
>  
> +     enable_refill_work(vi);
> +
>       if (netif_running(vi->dev)) {
>               for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++)
>                       if (!try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
> @@ -3548,6 +3581,7 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>       vdev->priv = vi;
>  
>       INIT_WORK(&vi->config_work, virtnet_config_changed_work);
> +     spin_lock_init(&vi->refill_lock);
>  
>       /* If we can receive ANY GSO packets, we must allocate large ones. */
>       if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) ||


Can't say I love all the extra state but oh well.

> -- 
> 2.25.1

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to