On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 05:11:54PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroe...@suse.de>
> 
> A recent fix introduced viommu_capable() but other changes
> from Robin change the function signature of the call-back it
> is used for.
> 
> When both changes are merged a compile error will happen
> because the function pointer types mismatch. Fix that by
> updating the viommu_capable() signature after the merge.
> 
> Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-phili...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroe...@suse.de>

Reviewed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-phili...@linaro.org>

> ---
>  drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> index da463db9f12a..1b12825e2df1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> @@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ static int viommu_of_xlate(struct device *dev, struct 
> of_phandle_args *args)
>       return iommu_fwspec_add_ids(dev, args->args, 1);
>  }
>  
> -static bool viommu_capable(enum iommu_cap cap)
> +static bool viommu_capable(struct device *dev, enum iommu_cap cap)
>  {
>       switch (cap) {
>       case IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY:
> -- 
> 2.36.1
> 
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to