On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 11:11:24PM +0900, Suwan Kim wrote:
> Driver should set req->state to MQ_RQ_COMPLETE after it finishes to process
> req. But virtio-blk doesn't set MQ_RQ_COMPLETE after virtblk_poll() handles
> req and req->state still remains MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT. Fortunately so far there
> is no issue about it because blk_mq_end_request_batch() sets req->state to
> MQ_RQ_IDLE. This patch properly sets req->state after polling I/O is finished.
>
> Fixes: 4e0400525691 ("virtio-blk: support polling I/O")
> Signed-off-by: Suwan Kim <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> index 19da5defd734..cf64d256787e 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> @@ -839,6 +839,7 @@ static void virtblk_complete_batch(struct io_comp_batch
> *iob)
> rq_list_for_each(&iob->req_list, req) {
> virtblk_unmap_data(req, blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req));
> virtblk_cleanup_cmd(req);
> + blk_mq_set_request_complete(req);
> }
> blk_mq_end_request_batch(iob);
> }The doc comment for blk_mq_set_request_complete() mentions this being used in ->queue_rq(), but that's not the case here. Does the doc comment need to be updated if we're using the function in a different way? I'm not familiar enough with the Linux block APIs, but this feels weird to me. Shouldn't blk_mq_end_request_batch(iob) take care of this for us? Why does it set the state to IDLE instead of COMPLETE? I think Jens can confirm whether we really want all drivers that use polling and io_comp_batch to manually call blk_mq_set_request_complete(). Thanks, Stefan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
