On 14-12-22, 13:36, Conghui wrote: > This updates the maintainer for virtio i2c drvier > > Signed-off-by: Conghui <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Jian Jun Chen <[email protected]> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index a8c8f6b42436..44747f4641a6 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -21920,7 +21920,7 @@ F: include/uapi/linux/virtio_snd.h > F: sound/virtio/* > > VIRTIO I2C DRIVER > -M: Conghui Chen <[email protected]> > +M: Jian Jun Chen <[email protected]> > M: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> > L: [email protected] > L: [email protected]
Wolfram, I understand that it is okay to pass the maintainership, within the company, for platform specific parts from one person to another, since they have the best knowledge of the code and are the only one interested in maintaining it too. But what is the rule for generic drivers like this one ? -- viresh _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
