On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:55 PM Alvaro Karsz <alvaro.ka...@solid-run.com> wrote: > > My point is that the device may complete the control command after the > timeout,
This needs to be proposed to the virtio spec first. And actually we need more than this: 1) we still need a way to deal with the device without this feature 2) driver can't depend solely on what is advertised by the device (e.g device can choose to advertise a very long timeout) > so, if I'm not mistaken, next time we send a control command and call > virtqueue_wait_for_used we'll get the previous response. > In the next version, I will first put BAD_RING() to prevent future requests for cvq. Note that the patch can't fix all the issues, we need more things on top. But it's a good step and it will behave much better than the current code. Thanks _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
