On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 01:00:22PM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> In virtnet_probe(), if the device doesn't provide a MAC address the
> driver assigns a random one.
> As we modify the MAC address we need to notify the device to allow it
> to update all the related information.
> 
> The problem can be seen with vDPA and mlx5_vdpa driver as it doesn't
> assign a MAC address by default. The virtio_net device uses a random
> MAC address (we can see it with "ip link"), but we can't ping a net
> namespace from another one using the virtio-vdpa device because the
> new MAC address has not been provided to the hardware.

And then what exactly happens? Does hardware drop the outgoing
or the incoming packets? Pls include in the commit log.

> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 7723b2a49d8e..4bdc8286678b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -3800,6 +3800,8 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>               eth_hw_addr_set(dev, addr);
>       } else {
>               eth_hw_addr_random(dev);
> +             dev_info(&vdev->dev, "Assigned random MAC address %pM\n",
> +                      dev->dev_addr);
>       }
>  
>       /* Set up our device-specific information */
> @@ -3956,6 +3958,18 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>       pr_debug("virtnet: registered device %s with %d RX and TX vq's\n",
>                dev->name, max_queue_pairs);
>  
> +     /* a random MAC address has been assigned, notify the device */
> +     if (!virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC) &&
> +         virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR)) {

Maybe add a comment explaining that we don't fail probe if
VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR is not there because
many devices work fine without getting MAC explicitly.

> +             struct scatterlist sg;
> +
> +             sg_init_one(&sg, dev->dev_addr, dev->addr_len);
> +             if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC,
> +                                       VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC_ADDR_SET, &sg)) {
> +                     dev_warn(&vdev->dev, "Failed to update MAC address.\n");

Here, I'm not sure we want to proceed. Is it useful sometimes?
I note that we deny with virtnet_set_mac_address.

> +             }
> +     }
> +
>       return 0;



Also, some code duplication with virtnet_set_mac_address here.

Also:
        When using the legacy interface, \field{mac} is driver-writable
        which provided a way for drivers to update the MAC without
        negotiating VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR.

How about factoring out code in virtnet_set_mac_address
and reusing that?


This will also handle corner cases such as VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY
which are not currently addressed.


>  free_unregister_netdev:
> -- 
> 2.39.0

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to