On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 04:32:02PM -0500, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 02:53:58PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 02:45:39PM -0500, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 11:14:46AM +0100, Peter-Jan Gootzen wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > [cc German] > > > > > > For my MSc thesis project in collaboration with IBM > > > > (https://github.com/IBM/dpu-virtio-fs) we are looking to improve the > > > > performance of the virtio-fs driver in high throughput scenarios. We > > > > think > > > > the main bottleneck is the fact that the virtio-fs driver does not > > > > support > > > > multi-queue (while the spec does). A big factor in this is that our > > > > setup on > > > > the virtio-fs device-side (a DPU) does not easily allow multiple cores > > > > to > > > > tend to a single virtio queue. > > > > This is an interesting limitation in DPU. > > Virtqueues are single-consumer queues anyway. Sharing them between > multiple threads would be expensive. I think using multiqueue is natural > and not specific to DPUs.
Can we create multiple threads (a thread pool) on DPU and let these threads process requests in parallel (While there is only one virt queue). So this is what we had done in virtiofsd. One thread is dedicated to pull the requests from virt queue and then pass the request to thread pool to process it. And that seems to help with performance in certain cases. Is that possible on DPU? That itself can give a nice performance boost for certain workloads without having to implement multiqueue actually. Just curious. I am not opposed to the idea of multiqueue. I am just curious about the kind of performance gain (if any) it can provide. And will this be helpful for rust virtiofsd running on host as well? Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
