On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:18:15 +0200, Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 20:04 +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > The purpose of this patch is to simplify the receive_mergeable().
> > Separate all the logic of XDP into a function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> >  1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index 136131a7868a..c8978d8d8adb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -1316,6 +1316,63 @@ static void *mergeable_xdp_prepare(struct 
> > virtnet_info *vi,
> >     return page_address(xdp_page) + VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM;
> >  }
> >
> > +static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable_xdp(struct net_device *dev,
> > +                                        struct virtnet_info *vi,
> > +                                        struct receive_queue *rq,
> > +                                        struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog,
> > +                                        void *buf,
> > +                                        void *ctx,
> > +                                        unsigned int len,
> > +                                        unsigned int *xdp_xmit,
> > +                                        struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats)
> > +{
> > +   struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr = buf;
> > +   int num_buf = virtio16_to_cpu(vi->vdev, hdr->num_buffers);
> > +   struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(buf);
> > +   int offset = buf - page_address(page);
> > +   unsigned int xdp_frags_truesz = 0;
> > +   struct sk_buff *head_skb;
> > +   unsigned int frame_sz;
> > +   struct xdp_buff xdp;
> > +   void *data;
> > +   u32 act;
> > +   int err;
> > +
> > +   data = mergeable_xdp_prepare(vi, rq, xdp_prog, ctx, &frame_sz, 
> > &num_buf, &page,
> > +                                offset, &len, hdr);
> > +   if (!data)
> > +           goto err_xdp;
> > +
> > +   err = virtnet_build_xdp_buff_mrg(dev, vi, rq, &xdp, data, len, frame_sz,
> > +                                    &num_buf, &xdp_frags_truesz, stats);
> > +   if (unlikely(err))
> > +           goto err_xdp;
> > +
> > +   act = virtnet_xdp_handler(xdp_prog, &xdp, dev, xdp_xmit, stats);
> > +
> > +   switch (act) {
> > +   case VIRTNET_XDP_RES_PASS:
> > +           head_skb = build_skb_from_xdp_buff(dev, vi, &xdp, 
> > xdp_frags_truesz);
> > +           if (unlikely(!head_skb))
> > +                   goto err_xdp;
> > +           return head_skb;
> > +
> > +   case VIRTNET_XDP_RES_CONSUMED:
> > +           return NULL;
> > +
> > +   case VIRTNET_XDP_RES_DROP:
> > +           break;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +err_xdp:
> > +   put_page(page);
> > +   mergeable_buf_free(rq, num_buf, dev, stats);
> > +
> > +   stats->xdp_drops++;
> > +   stats->drops++;
> > +   return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev,
> >                                      struct virtnet_info *vi,
> >                                      struct receive_queue *rq,
> > @@ -1325,21 +1382,22 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct 
> > net_device *dev,
> >                                      unsigned int *xdp_xmit,
> >                                      struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats)
> >  {
> > -   struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr = buf;
> > -   int num_buf = virtio16_to_cpu(vi->vdev, hdr->num_buffers);
> > -   struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(buf);
> > -   int offset = buf - page_address(page);
> > -   struct sk_buff *head_skb, *curr_skb;
> > -   struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
> >     unsigned int truesize = mergeable_ctx_to_truesize(ctx);
> >     unsigned int headroom = mergeable_ctx_to_headroom(ctx);
> >     unsigned int tailroom = headroom ? sizeof(struct skb_shared_info) : 0;
> >     unsigned int room = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(headroom + tailroom);
> > -   unsigned int frame_sz;
> > -   int err;
> > +   struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr;
> > +   struct sk_buff *head_skb, *curr_skb;
> > +   struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
> > +   struct page *page;
> > +   int num_buf;
> > +   int offset;
> >
> >     head_skb = NULL;
> >     stats->bytes += len - vi->hdr_len;
> > +   hdr = buf;
> > +   num_buf = virtio16_to_cpu(vi->vdev, hdr->num_buffers);
> > +   page = virt_to_head_page(buf);
> >
> >     if (unlikely(len > truesize - room)) {
> >             pr_debug("%s: rx error: len %u exceeds truesize %lu\n",
> > @@ -1348,51 +1406,21 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct 
> > net_device *dev,
> >             goto err_skb;
> >     }
> >
> > -   if (likely(!vi->xdp_enabled)) {
> > -           xdp_prog = NULL;
> > -           goto skip_xdp;
> > -   }
> > -
> > -   rcu_read_lock();
> > -   xdp_prog = rcu_dereference(rq->xdp_prog);
> > -   if (xdp_prog) {
> > -           unsigned int xdp_frags_truesz = 0;
> > -           struct xdp_buff xdp;
> > -           void *data;
> > -           u32 act;
> > -
> > -           data = mergeable_xdp_prepare(vi, rq, xdp_prog, ctx, &frame_sz, 
> > &num_buf, &page,
> > -                                        offset, &len, hdr);
> > -           if (!data)
> > -                   goto err_xdp;
> > -
> > -           err = virtnet_build_xdp_buff_mrg(dev, vi, rq, &xdp, data, len, 
> > frame_sz,
> > -                                            &num_buf, &xdp_frags_truesz, 
> > stats);
> > -           if (unlikely(err))
> > -                   goto err_xdp;
> > -
> > -           act = virtnet_xdp_handler(xdp_prog, &xdp, dev, xdp_xmit, stats);
> > -
> > -           switch (act) {
> > -           case VIRTNET_XDP_RES_PASS:
> > -                   head_skb = build_skb_from_xdp_buff(dev, vi, &xdp, 
> > xdp_frags_truesz);
> > -                   if (unlikely(!head_skb))
> > -                           goto err_xdp;
> > -
> > +   if (likely(vi->xdp_enabled)) {
>
> This changes the branch prediction hint compared to the existing code;
> as we currently have:
>       if (likely(!vi->xdp_enabled)) {
>
>
> and I think it would be better avoid such change.


Yes.

Will fix.

Thanks.


>
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to