On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 2:03 PM Srivatsa Vaddagiri
<quic_svadd...@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
> * Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> [2024-07-29 10:16:48]:
>
> > > Without this optimization, guest VCPU would have stalled until VMM in 
> > > host can
> > > emulate it, which can be long, especially a concern when the read is 
> > > issued in
> > > hot path (interrupt handler, w/o MSI_X).
> >
> > I think I agree with Michael, let's try to use MSI-X here where
> > there's a lot of existing optimizations in various layers.
>
> Yes sure. Even if we implement MSI-X, there is a security angle to why we want
> hypervisor-hosted PCI bus (have provided details in an earlier reply
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/virtio-dev/20240726070609.gb723...@quicinc.com/T/#m84455763d6b4d0d3b8df814b3d64e6e48ec12ae3
>
>
> > > > > We will however likely need vduse to support configuration writes 
> > > > > (guest VM
> > > > > updating configuration space, for ex: writing to 'events_clear' field 
> > > > > in case of
> > > > > virtio-gpu). Would vduse maintainers be willing to accept 
> > > > > config_write support
> > > > > for select devices/features (as long as the writes don't violate any 
> > > > > safety
> > > > > concerns we may have)?
> > > >
> > > > I think so, looking at virtio_gpu_config_changed_work_func(), the
> > > > events_clear seems to be fine to have a posted semantic.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe you can post an RFC to support config writing and let's start 
> > > > from there?
>
> Does VDUSE support runtime configuration changes (ex: block device capacity
> changes)?

Looks like it can, it has VDUSE_DEV_INJECT_CONFIG_IRQ.

> I am curious how the atomicity of that update is handled. For ex:
> guest reading config space while concurrent updates are underway (SET_CONFIG).
> I think the generation count should help there - but it was not clear to me 
> how
> VDUSE is handling generation_count reads during such concurrent udpates.

Similar to the above, we are missing uAPI to do that. Probably just an
uAPI to update the device generation.

Thanks

>
> - vatsa
>


Reply via email to