Hi Robin,

On 8/14/25 6:47 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Much like arm-smmu in commit 7d835134d4e1 ("iommu/arm-smmu: Make
> instance lookup robust"), virtio-iommu appears to have the same issue
> where iommu_device_register() makes the IOMMU instance visible to other
> API callers (including itself) straight away, but internally the
> instance isn't ready to recognise itself for viommu_probe_device() to
> work correctly until after viommu_probe() has returned. This matters a
> lot more now that bus_iommu_probe() has the DT/VIOT knowledge to probe
> client devices the way that was always intended. Tweak the lookup and
> initialisation in much the same way as for arm-smmu, to ensure that what
> we register is functional and ready to go.
>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: bcb81ac6ae3c ("iommu: Get DT/ACPI parsing into the proper probe path")
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com>

This version works for me. Thanks for the diligent respin.

Tested-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>

Thanks

Eric



> ---
>
> v2: Of course generic bus_find_device_by_fwnode() didn't work, since
>     it's dev->parent we need to check rather than dev itself, sigh...
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c | 15 +++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> index 532db1de201b..b39d6f134ab2 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> @@ -998,8 +998,7 @@ static void viommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, 
> struct list_head *head)
>       iommu_dma_get_resv_regions(dev, head);
>  }
>  
> -static const struct iommu_ops viommu_ops;
> -static struct virtio_driver virtio_iommu_drv;
> +static const struct bus_type *virtio_bus_type;
>  
>  static int viommu_match_node(struct device *dev, const void *data)
>  {
> @@ -1008,8 +1007,9 @@ static int viommu_match_node(struct device *dev, const 
> void *data)
>  
>  static struct viommu_dev *viommu_get_by_fwnode(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
>  {
> -     struct device *dev = driver_find_device(&virtio_iommu_drv.driver, NULL,
> -                                             fwnode, viommu_match_node);
> +     struct device *dev = bus_find_device(virtio_bus_type, NULL, fwnode,
> +                                          viommu_match_node);
> +
>       put_device(dev);
>  
>       return dev ? dev_to_virtio(dev)->priv : NULL;
> @@ -1160,6 +1160,9 @@ static int viommu_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>       if (!viommu)
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +     /* Borrow this for easy lookups later */
> +     virtio_bus_type = dev->bus;
> +
>       spin_lock_init(&viommu->request_lock);
>       ida_init(&viommu->domain_ids);
>       viommu->dev = dev;
> @@ -1229,10 +1232,10 @@ static int viommu_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>       if (ret)
>               goto err_free_vqs;
>  
> -     iommu_device_register(&viommu->iommu, &viommu_ops, parent_dev);
> -
>       vdev->priv = viommu;
>  
> +     iommu_device_register(&viommu->iommu, &viommu_ops, parent_dev);
> +
>       dev_info(dev, "input address: %u bits\n",
>                order_base_2(viommu->geometry.aperture_end));
>       dev_info(dev, "page mask: %#llx\n", viommu->pgsize_bitmap);


Reply via email to