On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 12:22:50PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
> > Sent: 22 August 2025 03:52 PM
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 12:17:06PM +0300, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > This reverts commit 43bb40c5b926 ("virtio_pci: Support surprise removal of
> > virtio pci device").
> > >
> > > Virtio drivers and PCI devices have never fully supported true
> > > surprise (aka hot unplug) removal. Drivers historically continued
> > > processing and waiting for pending I/O and even continued synchronous
> > > device reset during surprise removal. Devices have also continued
> > > completing I/Os, doing DMA and allowing device reset after surprise
> > > removal to support such drivers.
> > >
> > > Supporting it correctly would require a new device capability
> >
> > If a device is removed, it is removed.
> This is how it was implemented and none of the virtio drivers supported it.
> So vendors had stepped away from such device implementation.
> (not just us).
If the slot does not have a mechanical interlock, I can pull the device
out. It's not up to a device implementation.
--
MST
