On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 05:10:39PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 04:23:53PM +0200, Luigi Leonardi wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 04:22:12PM +0200, Luigi Leonardi wrote: > > > From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> > > > > > > Upstream commit 059b7dbd20a6f0c539a45ddff1573cb8946685b5 > > > > > > virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt() checks vvs->rx_bytes + len > vvs->buf_alloc. > > > > > > virtio_transport_recv_enqueue() skips coalescing for packets > > > with VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM. > > > > > > If fed with packets with len == 0 and VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM, > > > a very large number of packets can be queued > > > because vvs->rx_bytes stays at 0. > > > > > > Fix this by estimating the skb metadata size: > > > > > > (Number of skbs in the queue) * SKB_TRUESIZE(0) > > > > > > Fixes: 077706165717 ("virtio/vsock: don't use skbuff state to account > > > credit") > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Arseniy Krasnov <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Jason Wang <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Xuan Zhuo <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Eugenio Pérez <[email protected]> > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] > > > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> > > > [LL: Fixed conflict since this tree does not use buf_used added by commit > > > 45ca7e9f0730 ("vsock/virtio: fix `rx_bytes` accounting for stream > > > sockets")] > > > Signed-off-by: Luigi Leonardi <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 4 +++- > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c > > > b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c > > > index 4c374c36c29d..86e3051d000e 100644 > > > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c > > > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c > > > @@ -283,7 +283,9 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct > > > vsock_sock *vsk, > > > static bool virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs, > > > u32 len) > > > { > > > - if (vvs->rx_bytes + len > vvs->buf_alloc) > > > + u64 skb_overhead = (skb_queue_len(&vvs->rx_queue) + 1) * > > > SKB_TRUESIZE(0); > > > + > > > + if (skb_overhead + vvs->rx_bytes + len > vvs->buf_alloc) > > > return false; > > > > > > vvs->rx_bytes += len; > > > > > > --- > > > base-commit: 3b9f64db049687c0d38b4b3ef2f297f0642179af > > > change-id: 20260515-dumazet-07c0c855a9e2 > > > > > > Best regards, > > > -- > > > Luigi Leonardi <[email protected]> > > > > > > > Forgot to add this is material for 6.6.y stable tree. > > What about all of the newer stable trees? You can't just apply a patch > to an old branch :(
Ah, is this due to your other email? that makes more sense, sorry for the noise. greg "drowning in email" k-h
