On 10/12/26 08:44, Abhin Parekadan Jose wrote:
> Gentle ping on this fix for the syzbot report.
>
> Dmitry, Gerd, do you have a preference between moving mutex_destroy()
> to virtio_gpu_release() (this patch) and using drmm_mutex_init()? I can
> send a v2 with the other option if you prefer it.
>
> Thanks,
> Abhin
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 07:07:14AM +0000, Abhin Parekadan Jose wrote:
>> virtio_gpu_deinit() calls mutex_destroy() on obj_restore_lock, but
>> deinit runs from virtio_gpu_remove() at unbind or PCI remove, and GEM
>> objects can outlive that. An open /dev/fb0 keeps the fbdev buffer
>> alive, and the fbdev DRM client holds a drm_device reference. When the
>> fd is finally closed, the buffer is freed and takes the destroyed lock:
>>
>> fb_release()
>> drm_fbdev_shmem_fb_destroy()
>> drm_client_buffer_delete()
>> virtio_gpu_free_object()
>> virtio_gpu_remove_from_restore_list()
>> mutex_lock(&vgdev->obj_restore_lock)
>>
>> DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock)
>> WARNING: kernel/locking/mutex.c:625 at __mutex_lock+0xf2c/0x12ec
>>
>> virtio_gpu_deinit() should only do hardware teardown in this case
>> related virtio, its queues and others. Software state that GEM callbacks
>> still use belongs in virtio_gpu_release(), which runs on the final
>> drm_dev_put().
>>
>> There are two equivalent ways to tie the mutex lifetime to the
>> drm_device:
>>
>> 1) Move mutex_destroy() from virtio_gpu_deinit() to the end of
>> virtio_gpu_release(). This is what this patch does. It is the
>> smallest change and keeps the teardown next to the rest of the
>> final-put software cleanup.
>>
>> 2) Initialise the lock with drmm_mutex_init() (checking its return
>> value) and drop mutex_destroy() from virtio_gpu_deinit(), so DRM's
>> managed release destroys it. This also covers the virtio_gpu_init()
>> error path, where release returns early because dev_private is
>> NULL. Skipping mutex_destroy() there is harmless, since it only
>> matters for mutex debugging.
>>
>> Either fix removes the WARN. Option 1 is sent as the smaller change,
>> and option 2 can be done instead if preferred.
>>
>> Reproduced on arm64 QEMU (-device virtio-gpu-pci) with DEBUG_MUTEXES
>> and PROVE_LOCKING: open /dev/fb0, write 1 to
>> /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:01.0/remove, then close the fd. With this
>> patch the WARN is gone, and rebinding brings back /dev/fb0 and
>> /dev/dri/card0.
>>
>> Fixes: 54a970048296 ("drm/virtio: Add support for saving and restoring
>> virtio_gpu_objects")
>> Reported-by: [email protected]
>> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3590d97d8a586fa955c2
>> Assisted-by: LLM
>> Signed-off-by: Abhin Parekadan Jose <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_kms.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_kms.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_kms.c
>> index 1d4d3bf46a20..0ec755c35050 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_kms.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_kms.c
>> @@ -354,7 +354,6 @@ void virtio_gpu_deinit(struct drm_device *dev)
>> virtio_reset_device(vgdev->vdev);
>> virtio_gpu_reclaim_vbufs(vgdev);
>> vgdev->vdev->config->del_vqs(vgdev->vdev);
>> - mutex_destroy(&vgdev->obj_restore_lock);
>> }
>>
>> void virtio_gpu_release(struct drm_device *dev)
>> @@ -370,6 +369,8 @@ void virtio_gpu_release(struct drm_device *dev)
>>
>> if (vgdev->has_host_visible)
>> drm_mm_takedown(&vgdev->host_visible_mm);
>> +
>> + mutex_destroy(&vgdev->obj_restore_lock);
>> }
>>
>> int virtio_gpu_driver_open(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
Calling virtio_gpu_deinit() from virtio_gpu_release() might be a better
option
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
