On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 11:29:35AM +0800, Fang Xieyan wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Yes, same fix - sorry. The October 21 posting is a duplicate > of the v2 I posted on September 26: > > https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/[email protected]/ > > I resent it as a new patch instead of a v3. > > The !len form is equivalent to v2's len < sizeof(struct > vring_desc) check when combined with the modulo check - > zero is the only length below one descriptor that is also > a multiple of the descriptor size. > > The diagnostic change is to pass the byte-order converted > len instead of the raw desc->len, so the reported length is > correct when the vring byte order differs from the CPU byte > order. > > Would you prefer that I send a v3 on the original v2 thread > with this diagnostic correction, or should I drop the > October 21 posting and leave v2 as is? > > Thanks, > Fang
pls take a look at my tree, vhost branch. if you want any changes made wrt that, pls let me know. -- MST
