On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 08:33 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > > +++ linux-2.6-patched/mm/page_alloc.c 2006-09-01 12:49:35.000000000 > > +0200 > > @@ -515,6 +515,7 @@ static void __free_pages_ok(struct page > > reserved += free_pages_check(page + i); > > if (reserved) > > return; > > + page_set_unused(page, order); > > > > kernel_map_pages(page, 1 << order, 0); > > local_irq_save(flags); > > Do these have anything in common with arch_free_page()? I thought > marking the pages as being "unused by the kernel" was the whole idea of > having that hook.
This question did come up already. arch_free_page() is done before the PageReserved() check so it isn't suitable for stable/unused state transitions. You can argue that arch_free_page() should be moved but who knows what the architecture defined function is supposed to do? page_set_stable/page_set_unused on the other hand have a clearly defined meaning. -- blue skies, Martin. Martin Schwidefsky Linux for zSeries Development & Services IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
