* Randy Dunlap ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Since Voyager and Visual WS already define ARCH_SETUP,
> it looks like PARAVIRT shouldn't be offered for them.
> 
> In file included from arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:63:
> include/asm-i386/mach-visws/setup_arch.h:8:1: warning: "ARCH_SETUP" redefined
> In file included from include/asm/msr.h:5,
>                  from include/asm/processor.h:17,
>                  from include/asm/thread_info.h:16,
>                  from include/linux/thread_info.h:21,
>                  from include/linux/preempt.h:9,
>                  from include/linux/spinlock.h:49,
>                  from include/linux/capability.h:45,
>                  from include/linux/sched.h:46,
>                  from arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:26:
> include/asm/paravirt.h:163:1: warning: this is the location of the previous 
> definition
> In file included from arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:63:
> include/asm-i386/mach-visws/setup_arch.h:8:1: warning: "ARCH_SETUP" redefined
> In file included from include/asm/msr.h:5,
>                  from include/asm/processor.h:17,
>                  from include/asm/thread_info.h:16,
>                  from include/linux/thread_info.h:21,
>                  from include/linux/preempt.h:9,
>                  from include/linux/spinlock.h:49,
>                  from include/linux/capability.h:45,
>                  from include/linux/sched.h:46,
>                  from arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:26:
> include/asm/paravirt.h:163:1: warning: this is the location of the previous 
> definition
> 
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Acked-by: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to