On Tuesday 12 December 2006 21:11, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > I don't think being incompatible to old binaries is a sensible default. That > > is why I changed the wrong default. If paravirt ops cannot supply > > a compatible vdso it has to do without one. > > Do you know what glibc2.1 actually needs from the vdso? Does it > actually interpret as an elf file,
Interpret it as a ELF file, but then has some special hacks to jump directly anyways (or at least there is no direct linking, but it goes over a trampoline in the main glibc) The failure is an assertation failure in ld.so. -Andi _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
