Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> Add Xen interface header files. These are taken fairly directly from
>> the Xen tree and hence the style is not entirely in accordance with
>> Linux guidelines. There is a tension between fitting with Linux coding
>> rules and ease of maintenance.
>>
>> Define macros and inline functions for doing hypercalls into the
>> hypervisor.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Signed-off-by: Ian Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Limpach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>> --
>> include/asm-i386/hypercall.h | 416 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/asm-i386/hypervisor.h | 72 +++++
>>
>
> Are hypercall.h and hypervisor.h generic or are they Xen specific.
> If they are Xen specific (as it appears) then are inappropriately
> named.
>
Thanks for the reminder; I've been meaning to move/rename these.
>> include/xen/interface/arch-x86_32.h | 187 +++++++++++++
>>
> Why isn't this file include-asm-i386/xen/arch-x86_32.h ?
>
Those files are more or less directly copied from the Xen tree, and its
easier if they don't drift too far in name and directory structure.
J
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
