On Dec 12, 2012, at 7:24 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > The problem is that these graphs are purpose specific. For instance, they > don't have anything to do with DBpedia, they are installed by for use by our > Faceted Browser (re. <facets>). Basically, this is where it gets confusing > since we have two usage scenarios overlapping. These special system graphs > aren't part of the DBpedia data space, they are only created when the Faceted > Browser component is installed. > > Of course, if you want to make use of them in a more generic sense, you can > just copy the data to an appropriately named graph inline with the SPARQL > specs for graph IRIs. > > I hope this helps you understand what's happening here. Basically, this is > about special systems data installed by specific application modules that > serve specific application needs.
Hi Kingsley, I understand "what's happening here." And you're free to do it that way. I just don't think you should be claiming that what you're doing is acceptable for a conforming SPARQL implementation. This named graph behavior isn't standard, and makes it impossible for clients to correctly find that data using exploratory queries (whether or not you think the data is relevant to them). .greg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ Virtuoso-users mailing list Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users
