On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 15:13 -0700, Peter Ansell wrote: > You aren't using valid RDF/XML.
Why? While you don't give me details, I don't find why this serialization is not valid... Let's put a concrete example of the conflictive peace of code: <?xml version="1.0"?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"; xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/";> <foaf:Person rdf:about="http://example.org#person"; rdf:type="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent";> <foaf:name>Person Example</foaf:name> </foaf:Person> </rdf:RDF> That is completelly valid RDF/XML accoding W3C recommendation, and works fine with W3C validator and several parsers, not with Virtuoso. So I guess we can say that this is a bug in the parser. Best regards, -- Sergio Fernández - sergio.fernan...@fundacionctic.org R&D Deparment CTIC Foundation - www.fundacionctic.org Phone: +34 984 29 12 12 Fax: +34 984 39 06 12 Edificio Centros Tecnológicos Parque Científico Tecnológico 33203 Cabueñes - Gijón - Asturias - Spain
