Hi Frans,
I am fairly new to SPARQL too. I would be curious to see what triple
patterns you used to get these two different results.
Best,
Todd
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Frans Knibbe | Geodan <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am a beginner with SPARQL. I have always been under the impression
> that the order of triple patterns in the WHERE clause of a SPARQL SELECT
> query does not matter. But now I got an unexpected result from a SPARQL
> query issued to my Virtuoso 6 endpoint. The query contains three triple
> patterns in the WHERE clause. I expected a solution of two triples, but
> I only got one. But after switching two triples I did get the expected
> result. So changing the order changes the result.
>
> Does this indicate a problem? Or do I have to get used to the idea that
> the order of the triple patterns in the WHERE clause does matter?
>
> Thanks,
> Frans
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Virtuoso-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users
>
--
Todd DeLuca
Scientific Programmer
Wall Lab, CBMI, Harvard Medical School
http://todddeluca.com
http://wall.hms.harvard.edu/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Virtuoso-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users
