Never mind that patch.
Its ust totally messy.
Why to we need number and name anyway ?
And not just use ast_chan->cid.cid_num ?
Michael


Btw. It works great. Sound is indeed better i think (than zaphfc).
But there is still a bad fifo problem (te mode outgoing, incomming is okay)


> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:visdn-hackers-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Michael Labuschke
> Gesendet: Samstag, 19. November 2005 23:55
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: AW: [Visdn-hackers] 2.6.14 kernel and asterisk 1.2
> 
> This is a patch to a patch ( matteos -head ( *-1.2) patch)
> 
> 
> --- visdn-0.0.0.orig/chan_visdn/chan_visdn.c    2005-11-19
> 23:43:15.000000000 +0100
> +++ visdn-0.0.0/chan_visdn/chan_visdn.c 2005-11-19 23:39:01.000000000
> +0100
> @@ -1413,8 +1413,10 @@
> 
>                 char *name=NULL, *number=NULL;
> 
> -               strcpy(name, ast_chan->cid.cid_name);
> -               strcpy(number, ast_chan->cid.cid_num);
> +               name=malloc(strlen(ast_chan->cid.cid_name) + 1);
> +               number=malloc(strlen(ast_chan->cid.cid_num) + 1);
> +               strncpy(name,
> ast_chan->cid.cid_name,sizeof(ast_chan->cid.cid_name));
> +               strncpy(number,
> ast_chan->cid.cid_num,sizeof(ast_chan->cid.cid_num));
> 
>                 if (number) {
>                         struct q931_ie_calling_party_number *cgpn =
> @@ -2165,6 +2167,7 @@
>  static const struct ast_channel_tech visdn_tech = {
>         .type = VISDN_CHAN_TYPE,
>         .description = VISDN_DESCRIPTION,
> +       .capabilities = AST_FORMAT_ALAW,
>         .requester = visdn_request,
>         .call = visdn_call,
>         .hangup = visdn_hangup,
> 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:visdn-hackers-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von oliver oli
> > Gesendet: Samstag, 19. November 2005 20:52
> > An: [email protected]
> > Betreff: [Visdn-hackers] 2.6.14 kernel and asterisk 1.2
> >
> > i'm using the snapshot from today with a 2.6.12 kernel and asterisk
> > 1.0.9. does it also work with 2.6.14 kernel and/or asterisk 1.2?
> >
> > btw, i have the impresion that visdn sounds a little bit better than
> > zaphfc...
> > _______________________________________________
> > Visdn-hackers mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://mailman.uli.it/mailman/listinfo/visdn-hackers
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Visdn-hackers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.uli.it/mailman/listinfo/visdn-hackers

_______________________________________________
Visdn-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.uli.it/mailman/listinfo/visdn-hackers

Reply via email to